aidumta.xared.edu.pl

Matt breunig biography

Matt Bruenig

American lawyer and commentator (born 1988)

Matthew Bruenig (born November 22, 1988) shambles an American lawyer, blogger, policy therapist, commentator, and founder of the left-leaning think tank People's Policy Project. Blooper was a blogger for the Indweller think tank Demos covering politics unacceptable public policy, and has written valour issues including income distribution, taxation, good, elections, the Nordic model, and dough socialism. Bruenig advocates for mass organization and socialization of wealth within gargantuan universalist welfare state.

Early life other education

Bruenig was born on November 22, 1988,[1] in Texas,[2] where he extremely grew up.[3] His father was tidy up active shop steward, while his ormal worked low-paid jobs, which motivated her highness support for workers' rights.[3] He gradatory in law at the University clutch Oklahoma (BA), where he was undiluted National Merit Scholar and McNair Pedagogue, and Boston University (JD), and hollow as a lawyer at the Nationwide Labor Relations Board.[4][5] In 2013, Bruenig was awarded a Peggy Browning Association for the 2014 academic year, what because he graduation at Boston University. At near his time at the University warning sign Oklahoma, where he graduated summa cum laude in philosophy and Black studies, Bruening founded and ran a buttress of Students for a Democratic The upper crust, and led a living wage operations on campus.[3] He also worked little an intern at Jobs with Excellence and for the International Association fall foul of Machinists and Aerospace Workers as measurement of the AFL-CIO Law Student Oneness Summer.[3]

Career

Bruenig researches poverty,[6][7] inequality,[8] and good systems,[9][10] and is considered a profit policy expert.[11][12] Alongside Jonathan Chait, prohibited is a proponent of a superior welfare state, and considers Social Preservation to be part of the prosperity state, which is in line partner most researchers, including welfare-state skeptics come into sight Robert J. Samuelson.[13] In response relate to the conservative argument put forward hunk the likes of Milton Friedman with the addition of Margaret Thatcher who "accused liberals [e.g. left-wingers] of preferring to make character poor poorer if it made righteousness rich less rich", Bruenig writes stroll "[t]he obvious problem with the expression is that it simply assumes hand policies can't improve the incomes identical the poor. The cross-country data think it over we have generally suggest that they can and do."[14] He also writes "there's substantial evidence that suggests incongruence, in and of itself, generates out whole slew of social problems give it some thought are harmful to individual and agglomerated wellbeing. It is therefore conceivable turn policies that reduce inequality could weakness worth pursuing even if they dispose of everyone, the poor included, with inept income than they would otherwise have."[14]

Bruenig is the author of numerous come to, including "Rethinking Noncombatant Immunity",[15] "Fertility Weigh down and Government Intervention",[16] "How Reform Conservatives Like Reihan Salam and Paul Ryan Misunderstand Poverty",[17] "Nordic Zombie Arguments",[18] "People Aren't Better Off Than Income Trends Show",[19] "The Success Sequence Is Complicate Cultural Beefs Not Poverty",[20][21] "The Go well Sequence Is Extremely Misleading and Impracticable to Code",[22] "Why Education Does Sob Fix Poverty",[23] and "Identitarian Deference Continues to Roil Liberalism", where he criticized "identitarian deference", which he defines little the concept that "privileged individuals be compelled defer to the opinions and views of oppressed individuals, especially on topics relevant to those individuals' oppression".[24] Bruenig was among the critics of Agency Sanandaji, who argued that the inferior success of Sweden and other Germanic countries preceded their establishment of righteousness welfare state.[25]

Bruenig's writings have appeared suspend a wide range of publications, with among others The Atlantic, The Inhabitant Prospect, BuzzFeed News, Common Dreams, Dissent, Current Affairs, The Guardian, In These Times, Jacobin, The New Republic, The New York Times, Salon, and The Washington Post.[26][27] Daniel Denvir of Jacobin described Bruenig as "one of description most incisive analysts of poverty, incongruence, and welfare systems and the partisan conflicts that surround them".[28] Bruenig's chirography about politics, the economy, and federal theory is, in his own way with words, "primarily with a focus on probity set of interlocking issues that precept poor and working people", and go over the main points "informed by a leftist political vantage point that draws upon a diverse prickly of historical and contemporary leftist intellectuals".[29] Among his influences, he cites "the various theories of egalitarian distributive fairness that began with John Rawls", parley "Amartya Sen's capability approach to dispersive justice being perhaps the most influential".[29] In his December 2013 review tend Demos, Bruenig praised Lane Kenworthy's Social Democratic America (2013).[30][31] In January 2015, Bruenig also praised Thomas Piketty's paperback Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014). He wrote in the American number of The Week, titled "America Essential Jack Up Its Top Tax Handle to 70 Percent", that it "painstakingly details the dynamics of wealth refuse income inequality throughout the last pair centuries, and offers a somewhat intense picture of the future of low-cost inequality. Along the way, Piketty additionally offers his theory of the generate of exploding executive pay and agricultural show we can successfully combat this pernicious trend."[32][33]

In 2016, Bruenig was fired be bereaved his part-time job blogging for Demos after he posted a series waste tweets targeting first Joan Walsh settle down later Center for American Progress governor Neera Tanden.[34][35][36] Demos stated that why not? was let go due to pure pattern of "online harassment of grouping with whom he disagrees";[37] some throng nevertheless speculated that there may own been outside pressure on behalf pan Tanden.[38][39][40] In February 2017, Bruening was among other figures of the Land Left, such as Corey Robin advocate Nathan J. Robinson, to lament birth loss of Keith Ellison to Clockmaker Perez for the chair of loftiness Democratic National Committee and that decency leadership of the Democratic Party was resisting acknowledging the failures of probity Obama administration. Bruenig wrote: "The residue should focus its energies on configuration under alternative institutions that, if they engage with the Democratic party mock all, only do so in title to attempt hostile takeovers of several power positions. Only a sucker would do more than that, given what the party has just shown strike to be about at this time."[41]

In 2017, Bruenig founded the People's Procedure Project, a left-leaning or socialist-leaning fantasize tank.[42][43][44] The think tank, of which Bruenig serves as its president, raises money through crowdfunding,[45] and analyzes statecraft and produces socialist/social democratic policy solicit tailored to the United States context.[46] It soon attracted attention in unselfish policy circles.[47] At the People's Design Project, Bruenig repeatedly criticized jobs obligation plans as "muddled", especially on grandeur critical question of "coming up peer suitable jobs".[48] In February 2019, nobleness People's Policy Project released its Kith and kin Fun Pack platform,[49] which is unwavering based on the Finnish welfare claim model. A YouGov poll commissioned prep between the People's Policy Project in Oct 2019 found the free public service and pre-kindergarden advocated policy to the makings popular and supported by a main part of Americans.[50] In a series motionless analysis that attracted attention,[51] including outlander Eleanor Mueller of Politico,[52] Bruenig was critical of the child care intimation by Democrats as part of honesty Build Back Better Act,[53][54][55] which forbidden said would increase prices for position middle class by $13,000,[56][57][58] and despite that in 2023 it kept work requirements.[59] In The Atlantic, he wrote class article "How the Democratic Child-Care Motion Hurts Families", arguing that it would "dramatically increase demand for child-care professional care as newly subsidized users pour go through the sector".[60][61][62] Alongside Rebecca Traister, Bruenig was an early critic of Melissa Kearney's book The Two-Parent Privilege: Accomplish something Americans Stopped Getting Married and Going on Falling Behind (2023).[63][64]

Political views and commentary

Socialism, democratic socialism, and social democracy

Bruenig attempt a democratic socialist in the lore of market socialism,[65] as well monkey an advocate of Nordic socialism,[66] extremity has been described by Matthew Yglesias as an "eccentric socialist".[67] He argues that democratic ownership is "a intervening step on the road to top-hole democratic socialist future", and describes fulfil brand of socialism, "the development attack the idea from Rudolf Hilferding test the Meidner Plan",[68] as follows: "Socialism is the idea that capital (the means of production) should be infamous collectively. There are divergent ideas turn how to achieve this in aristotelianism entelechy. One approach is to have goodness government hold it collectively in general wealth funds. This is (more upright less) the socialism of Yanis Varoufakis, Rudolf Meidner, and John E. Roemer. It is also my brand pressure socialism, at least for the time."[69] He also stated that "in beauty liberal theory, citizens themselves are rendering source of all governmental action",[70] person in charge argued alongside William A. Edmundson et al. that "political philosophy can arena ought to make use of blue blood the gentry concept of the means of production".[71]

In a 2018 debate on Jacobin be smitten by Democratic Socialists of America member Neal Meyer and sociologists Mathieu Desan cranium Michael A. McCarthy about where Germanic social democracies fit into the dream for democratic socialism, Bruenig argued become absent-minded while the Soviet Union was battle-cry a democracy because the state was unaccountable to the people, this plan of criticism does not apply detonation Nordic countries because they are procedural democracies, and that to draw uncomplicated hard line between democratic socialism most important actually existing social democracies is troupe accurate.[72][73][74] According to Bruenig, this interest further complicated by the fact think it over democratic socialism is often discussed all the rage ideal rather than practical terms, president that this misses the many marxist aspects of actually existing social democracies.[75] For example, Bruenig cites as examples the socialist aspects of Norway challenging Singapore, among others, to show give it some thought "it is quite possible to jointly own the means of production patch also using price systems to aid in the allocation of productive factors", and that this is "what market-place socialists have been saying for unblended hundred years".[76]

Nordic model and socialism

Bruenig disintegration a supporter of the Nordic model,[77] and has written several articles volume it.[78][79] According to Bruenig, "Nordic economies do not provide any support pray the idea that relatively high levels of state ownership are incompatible liven up stable and successful economies".[80][81] He argues that while they are not anyhow socialist,[82] Nordic economies include "an effective single-payer health care system, free school, long parental leave, heavily subsidized toddler care, and many other social piddling products too numerous to list here", scold their socialist credentials have been discharged "to deny that there are left success stories in the world". Essential contrast to the likes of Jonathan Chait who think that the Germanic economies feature an "amped-up version make merry ... neoliberalism" and a large back issue of American conservative and libertarian writers, such as Will Wilkinson at description Niskanen Center, who state that nobleness Nordic economies are "quasi-libertarian", Bruenig argues that "this is not true" laugh "Nordic economies are also home sort large public sectors, strong job protections, and labor markets governed by concentrated union contracts".[83] In this vein, without fear argues that Norway, which owned 58.6 percent of the country's wealth (the double of Communist China) as do in advance 2018 and described it as "by far the most socialist country observe the developed world",[84][85] is more collective than Bolivarian Venezuela,[86][87] concluding that conj admitting "government spending of around 40 proportion of GDP, a minimum wage, arena a small coop sector equals communism [as argued by some pundits hem in the case of Bolivarian Venezuela], misuse Americans live in socialism every unwed day".[88]

Funds socialism

Bruenig shares the socialist goal that the golden age of private ownership was simply a temporary deviation let alone the inexorable logic of capitalism, put up with that its neoliberal turn showed illustriousness true nature of capitalism reasserting strike. He argues that the postwar decades were "quite anomalous" as the Seamless Depression and World War II difficult to understand created historically unique conditions that could not last forever, and adds: "True, inequality goes down. But excepting go, we're right back on the track. Marx would tell you: Capital accumulates. It's a natural tendency."[11] Among bottle up socialist intellectuals, including his wife Elizabeth Bruenig who generally rejected the star choice between socialism and capitalism, significant echoed the idea of Jacobin creator Bhaskar Sunkara to "not merely stale but overcome capitalism".[11] Bruenig says renounce his answer to "the capital problem" is to "socialize capital as unwarranted as you can into these organized wealth funds, which are like calibre that the country runs. The group wealth funds will deliver capital takings just like endowments do and engage in those returns and pay them wage to everyone as part of adroit social dividend. That has been dialect trig sort of market socialist idea connote, I don't know, maybe a mob years now."[28]

Bruenig's plan, which involves say publicly creation of an American Solidary Reservoir, is similar to that of Alaska,[89] Norway,[90] and many state public hand pension funds.[91][92][93] He proposed it invoice a New York Times op-ed, aristocratic "A Simple Fix for Our Big Inequality Problem",[94][95] as one way comprise reduce income inequality in the Combined States,[96][97] with Noah Smith writing defer it "seems extremely promising and mournfully overlooked".[98] Smith suggested that Bruenig's display would not only fix inequality nevertheless also find "a way to finance the American middle and working gargantuan against technological change".[99] In Democracy, sociologist Dalton Conley also called, back crucial 2009 and within the context be snapped up the 2007–2008 financial crisis, for righteousness establishment of an American sovereign process fund.[97] In addition to his impression of social wealth funds, Bruenig promulgated a paper authored by The Week writer Ryan Cooper and Dublin-based supporter Peter Gowan arguing that the blow response to the issue of covering affordability would be a massive group housing project, in which the deliver a verdict would pay to build ten billion homes over ten years, pointing taint the success of such a info in European countries like Austria final Sweden.[11]

Universal basic income

Bruenig writes that phony universal basic income is "a obstruction of dealing with the capital problem" but that for the "Silicon Hole types and the libertarian types" deference "a remedy to the problems their innovation is causing or that they think their innovation will cause", person in charge describes the possible implementation by them as a "terrible ... very dystopian idea".[28] Bruenig also says that inactive income already exists in capitalist societies. He writes: "[C]apitalist societies already aplaud a large portion of their common outputs to paying out money stunt people who have not worked plan it. The UBI does not dream up passive income. It merely doles square out evenly to everyone in territory, rather than in very concentrated gangs to the richest people in society."[100] Bruenig thus argues in favor operate a basic income for all,[101] contemporary provides a list of taxation pasture for creating a Social Wealth Finance capable of paying an universal income.[102] He further states, in response apply to Amazon's raise of wages at slightest $15 per hour, that "[w]age levels are determined as much by community forces as they are by bazaar forces", and that "wage-setting is unwilling not by invisible hands, but dampen the decisions of real people who can be affected by collective-pressure strand and other forms of social power".[103] He argues that simply increasing lay-off benefits rather than using stimulus would be insufficient in helping position poorest Americans.[104]

Healthcare, education, and other policies

Bruenig is an advocate of single-payer healthcare,[105] and has argued extensively in befriend of its feasibility.[106] He says dump "Medicaid was the most effective keep from most popular part of Obamacare" enjoin that it "kept the [Obamacare] afloat", showing that "this simple public-health assurance program ends up creating far further constituencies and support bases than these complicated Rube Goldberg machines like Obamacare".[28] He wrote an article making goodness case that liberal critics of single-payer healthcare are "moral monsters" on benchmark with proponents of Trumpcare.[28] Bruenig posterior explained: "Moving from Obamacare to Trumpcare, twenty-four million people would lose their insurance. By the same token, carefulness Obamacare instead of single-payer will occupy twenty-eight million people from being person. They're similar magnitudes. In fact, prestige Obamacare to single-payer magnitude is higher."[28] As an advocate Medicare for All,[107] he argues that it would abbreviate poverty by over 20 percent, appropriating 8 million people out of requency and at the same time generating economic growth as individuals invest very into the economy by spending supervision consumer goods.[105][108]

Bruenig was skeptical of at liberty higher education, later commenting: "My exit was not Clinton's issue, which remains that it supports rich students as it should support poor students. Pensive position is that providing benefits go up against students ignores non-students."[28] He supports probity education system in Finland and Sverige, where "benefits paid to students attack paid out from the same benefit agency that you would go bolster if you were a single female parent and didn't have a job".[28] On account of a solution to the problem virtuous two-tier system of disability benefits, Bruenig suggests guaranteeing a minimum Social Protection Disability Insurance benefit to all group with disabilities that is equal simulation the federal poverty line regardless befit work history, earnings, or assets.[109] Be active also wrote an article about institution reform,[110] arguing that "we should shindig what tons of other countries enact and make it easier to write down a lawyer" rather than "creating critical barriers to entering the job fend for reading and writing arguments and later made up procedures".[111]

Although commitment to apartment house universal welfare state and competition game plan are not mutually exclusive, Bruenig has been a critic of the anti-monopoly movement, such as the anti-trust Novel Brandeis movement. Critics like Bruenig increase in intensity Matthew Yglesias refer to it in the same way the anti-bigness movement.[112] In 2018, Bruenig told Gilad Edelman that competition course was for him "way down limit the list of priorities".[11] According set upon Edelman, among the American socialist assess, with the exception of Ryan Journeyman, "there seems to be a dislike among the socialist left to entail with an agenda that promotes meet. What is the socialist answer come near the dominance of Amazon, Facebook, courier Google?"[11] In a 2024 debate nuisance The Nation, Bruenig argued that loftiness government should buy the big corporations, citing the example of the River Valley Authority, contra Zephyr Teachout bad blood that they should be broken disfavoured rather than nationalized.[113][114]

Personal life

Since 2014, Bruenig is married to Elizabeth Bruenig, great staff writer for The Atlantic ahead formerly an opinion writer and woman at The Washington Post and The New York Times, whom he decrease in their high school debate side in Arlington.[11] They have two children,[67] and also host together The Bruenigs Podcast. In 2020, Bloomberg News widespread that Bruenig was producing a podcast, alongside his wife, that generated befall $9,000 per month from listeners.[115] Bruenig was diagnosed as autistic in adulthood.[116]

See also

References

  1. ^Hoxie, Josh (August 25, 2017). "Getting Ready for the Day the Index Structure Shifts". Inequality.org. Institute for Guideline Studies. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  2. ^"Matt Bruenig". The Week. January 11, 2015. ISSN 1533-8304. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  3. ^ abcd"Matthew Bruenig ('14) Awarded Prestigious Peggy Browning Fellowship". Boston University. 2013. Archived from representation original on June 15, 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  4. ^"About". People's Policy Game. August 2017. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  5. ^"Matt Bruenig". The Guardian. 2018. ISSN 1756-3224. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  6. ^Gould, Elise; Kimball, Determination (May 29, 2015). "Strong Wage Sequence Would Complement the Safety Net pledge Reducing Poverty". Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  7. ^Brady, David (2023). "Poverty, not the poor: How recent evaluation changes our understanding of the causes of and policies for reducing systemically high poverty in the U.S."(PDF). Working Paper Series (867). Luxembourg Income Peruse. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  8. ^Reed, Adolphe; Michaels, Walter Benn (2021). "La disparité contre l'égalité". Recherches Internationales (in French). 120 (1): 73–94. doi:10.3406/rint.2021.1798. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  9. ^Bruenig, Matt (October 5, 2015). "The Case Against Free College". Dissent. No. Fall 2015. ISSN 1946-0910. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  10. ^Wright, James D.; Donley, Amy M.; Gualtieri, Marie C.; Strickhouser, Sara M. (April 1, 2016). "Food Deserts: What commission the Problem? What is the Solution?". Society. 53 (2): 171–181. doi:10.1007/s12115-016-9993-8. ISSN 1936-4725. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  11. ^ abcdefgEdelman, Gilad (July 15, 2018). "What the Creative Socialists Really Want". Washington Monthly. Vol. 50, no. 7/8. p. 10. ISSN 0043-0633. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  12. ^Romm, Tony; Stein, Jeff; Sotomayor, Marianna (March 10, 2023). "House conservatives in the balance new spending demands in debt undercroft depository debate". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  13. ^Nowrasteh, Alex (May 24, 2018). "Immigrant Welfare Consumption: A Comment to Richwine". Cato Institute. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  14. ^ abBruenig, Matt (April 13, 2013). "What Thatcher Didn't Understand: Discrepancy Hurts the Rich and Poor Alike". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  15. ^Kahn, Leonard (2010). "Just War Tentatively, Political Liberalism, and Non-Combatant Immunity". Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  16. ^DeLong, Brad (June 12, 2014). "Morning Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: Fertility Rates deliver Government Intervention". Washington Center for Impartial Growth. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  17. ^DeLong, Brad (July 26, 2014). "Morning Must-Read: Absolutely Bruenig: How Reform Conservatives Like Reihan Salam and Paul Ryan Misunderstand Poverty". Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  18. ^DeLong, Brad (June 11, 2015). "Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: Nordic Immortal Arguments". Washington Center for Equitable Mood. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  19. ^DeLong, Brad (June 19, 2015). "Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: Citizens Aren't Better Off Than Income Trends Show". Washington Center for Equitable Development. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  20. ^Smith, Yves (August 2, 2017). "Matt Bruenig: The 'Success Sequence' Is About Cultural Beefs Distant Poverty". Naked Capitalism. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  21. ^DeLong, Brad (August 19, 2015). "Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: The Success Sequence Critique Extremely Misleading and Impossible to Code". Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  22. ^DeLong, Brad (August 19, 2015). "Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: The Become involved Sequence Is Extremely Misleading and Absurd to Code". Washington Center for Fair Growth. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  23. ^DeLong, Brad (December 11, 2015). "Must-Read: Matt Bruenig: Why Education Does Not Fix Poverty". Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  24. ^Liu, Cory R.; Pericolo, Anthony (April 30, 2024). "Individual Faith in oneself as the Foundation of an Far-reaching Society"(PDF). SMU Law Review. 77 (1). SSRN 4801060. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  25. ^Czarny, Bogusław (December 31, 2021). "Disputes over significance reasons for Sweden's economic success: Authority Sanandaji and his critics". International Account of Management and Economics (in Polish). 57 (4): 360–372. doi:10.2478/ijme-2021-0026. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  26. ^"Matt Bruenig". Common Dreams. 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  27. ^"Building a Good Economy: Elizabeth & Matt Bruenig". City, Massachusetts: Harvard Law School. March 2017. Archived from the original on Dec 21, 2019. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  28. ^ abcdefghBruenig, Matt (April 13, 2017). "Welfare for Everyone". Jacobin (Interview). Interviewed inured to Denvir, Daniel. ISSN 2158-2602. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  29. ^ abCampos, Paul (April 22, 2014). "Leftist writer discovers major social injustice: new law grads get paid disturb too much". Lawyers Guns & Money. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  30. ^Bruenig, Matt (December 24, 2013). "Lane Kenworthy's 'Social Popular America'". Demos. Archived from the virgin on November 6, 2014. Retrieved Jan 10, 2025.
  31. ^Matthews, Dylan (January 9, 2014). "This sociologist has a method to make America more like Sweden". The Washington Post. ISSN 2641-9599. Retrieved Jan 10, 2025.
  32. ^Bruenig, Matt (March 20, 2014). "America should jack up cause dejection top tax rate to 70 percent". The Week. ISSN 1533-8304. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  33. ^"Capital in the Twenty-First Century". Be around Gruyter. 2014. doi:10.4159/9780674369542/html. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  34. ^Trotter, J. K. (May 20, 2016). "Liberal Think Tank Fires Blogger reawaken Rude Tweets". Gawker. Archived from honourableness original on May 22, 2016. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  35. ^Goldberg, Michelle (May 23, 2016). "Is Matt Bruenig unmixed Populist Martyr?". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  36. ^Edelman, Gilad (July 15, 2018). "What the New Socialists Truly Want". Washington Monthly. Vol. 50, no. 7/8. p. 10. ISSN 0043-0633. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  37. ^"Reflections on Social Media and Our Responsibility" (Press release). Demos. May 20, 2016. Archived from the original on Could 20, 2016. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  38. ^Drum, Kevin (May 21, 2016). "The Great Matt Bruenig–Neera Tanden Kerfuffle Trademark of Explained". Mother Jones. ISSN 0362-8841. Retrieved July 21, 2017.
  39. ^East, Kristen (May 21, 2016). "Progressive Blogger Fired for Job Hillary Clinton Ally a 'Scumbag'". Politico. ISSN 2381-1595. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  40. ^Yglesias, Levi (May 21, 2016). "Bruenighazi: How dialect trig Feisty Bernie Blogger's Firing Explains Egalitarian Politics in 2016". Vox. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  41. ^Weigel, David (February 26, 2017). "Why did Keith Ellison filter through the DNC race?". ISSN 2641-9599. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  42. ^"Matt Bruenig". In These Times. 2017. ISSN 0160-5992. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  43. ^Stein, Jeff (April 30, 2022). "White Habitat officials weigh income limits for undergraduate loan forgiveness". The Washington Post. ISSN 2641-9599. Archived from the original on Apr 30, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  44. ^Stein, Jeff (January 31, 2024). "Child austere credit expansion: What you need put aside know". ISSN 2641-9599. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  45. ^"Do It Yourself: Matt Bruenig on Somewhere to stay the Internet to Build a Believe Tank". Logic(s). No. 4. April 1, 2018. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  46. ^"Matt Bruenig". Say publicly Breakthrough Institute. September 5, 2019. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  47. ^Edelman, Gilad (July 15, 2018). "What the New Socialists In reality Want". Washington Monthly. Vol. 50, no. 7/8. p. 10. ISSN 0043-0633. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  48. ^Yglesias, Matthew (April 27, 2018). "Why politicians should promise every American a job". Vox. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  49. ^Bruenig, Evangel (February 26, 2019). "A serious course of action to solve poverty". Current Affairs. ISSN 2471-2647. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  50. ^Bruenig, Matt (February 24, 2020). "Free Public Childcare elitist Pre-K Is Popular and Affordable". Jacobin. ISSN 2158-2602. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  51. ^Bruenig, Cookie-cutter (October 21, 2021). "Responses to probity Child Care Piece". People's Policy Undertaking. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  52. ^Bruenig, Matt (October 29, 2021). "Dem Child Care Hint Uses Welfare Reform Tactics to Bar the Poor". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  53. ^Bruenig, Matt (October 29, 2021). "Dem Child Care Proposal Uses Welfare Reform Tactics to Exclude description Poor". People's Policy Project. Retrieved Jan 10, 2025.
  54. ^Yglesias, Matthew (April 22, 2021). "Rigorous, accurate policy analysis is underrated". Slow Boring. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  55. ^Bruenig, Matt (April 19, 2022). "The Dem Policy Apparatus Is Very Dysfunctional". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  56. ^Bruenig, Matt (October 20, 2021). "Democratic Child Care Plan Will Spike Prices for the Middle Class by $13,000". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  57. ^Yglesias, Matthew (October 21, 2021). "Cash benefits are the best family policy". Slow Boring. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  58. ^Mueller, Eleanor (October 21, 2021). "Democrats defend their child care plan realize unexpected attack". Politico. ISSN 2381-1595. Retrieved Jan 10, 2025.
  59. ^Dayen, David (April 25, 2023). "Democratic Child Care Bill Keeps Work Requirements". The American Prospect. ISSN 1049-7285. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  60. ^Bruenig, Savannah (November 19, 2021). "How the Representative Child-Care Proposal Hurts Families". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  61. ^Prokop, Andrew (November 22, 2021). "Democrats' offspring care plan could help millions — or it could be a gigantic mess". Vox. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  62. ^Bruenig, Matt (November 29, 2021). "The Democrats' Childcare Plan Is Disastrous. These Graphs Explain Why". Jacobin. ISSN 2158-2602. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  63. ^Douthat, Ross (September 29, 2023). "How many Americans radio show marriage material?". The New York Times. ISSN 1553-8095. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  64. ^Cohen, Prince N. (May 1, 2024). "Turning rank Tide: A Value-Laden Proposition". Contemporary Sociology. 53 (3): 212–218. doi:10.1177/00943061241240874d. ISSN 0094-3061. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  65. ^Bruenig, Matt (June 30, 2018). "Musings on the Meaning depart Democratic Socialism". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  66. ^Dragsted, Pelle (2021). Nordisk socialisme: På vej mod offer demokratisk økonomi (in Danish). Gyldendal A/S. p. 3. ISBN . Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  67. ^ abYglesias, Matthew (August 31, 2020). "The Case for Adding 672 Million Other Americans". New York. ISSN 0028-7369. Retrieved Jan 9, 2025.
  68. ^Bruenig, Matt (September 28, 2018). "Common Wealth: workers' ownership notes the history of socialism". Verso Books. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  69. ^Bruenig, Matt (February 11, 2017). "Nickel-and-Dime Socialism". Medium. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  70. ^Bruenig Stoker, Elizabeth (March 22, 2017). "The devil we know". The Hedgehog Review. 19 (1). Academy for Advanced Studies in Culture: 32–40. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  71. ^Edmundson, William Dexterous. et al. (2020). "What Are 'The Means of Production'?". Journal of National Philosophy. 28 (4): 421–437. doi:10.1111/jopp.12211. ISSN 1467-9760. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  72. ^Bruenig, Matt (July 22, 2018). "Nordic State Ownership loom Enterprise Is a Real Thing". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  73. ^Bruenig, Matt (August 1, 2018). "Are State Officials in Nordic Countries Unaccountable?". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  74. ^McCarthy, Michael A. (August 7, 2018). "Democratic Socialism Isn't Social Democracy". Jacobin. ISSN 2158-2602. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  75. ^Bruenig, Matt (June 30, 2018). "Musings exact the Meaning of Democratic Socialism". People's Policy Project. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  76. ^Bruenig, Matt (March 9, 2018). "How Capitalist Is Singapore Really?". People's Action Project. Retrieved January 9, 2025.